The title of a book by Wendell Berry puts the question of human coexistence to the fore: What Are People For? We ought to answer that question. Not in academically or theologically correct terms which exhibit our grasp of concepts, although we should do this too, but we should ask what are people for in my life today? Do they exist to accomplish my bidding, to run on every errand I may think to be important, to minimize my discomfort or inconvenience, or to execute “my vision,” which could be no more than a foggy perception of right now as seen through the groggy eyes of one just awakened from sleep?
Any answer to Berry’s question that sees people as those “through whom” we do anything at all borders on enslavement and usurpation of divine prerogatives. People do not exist in order that we may accomplish anything through them. People are not tools; they are not pawns; they are not hobbies; they are not property. As George Bush said in his Second Inaugural Address, “No one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave.”
People are to be loved. People are the apex of God’s creation, His only creation in which He invested His image—the imago Dei—and this is a twofold reason for love. (1) We are to love others because they bear the imago Dei. As bearers of the imago Dei, people are worthy to be loved. Anything that shares in God’s image is deserving of my care. (2) We are to love other people because we bear the imago Dei. As bearers of the imago Dei, we are to love what God loves. Seeing that God loves people, to the extent that He incarnated Himself and died for them, it follows that we ought to love what God loves. If we cannot love what God loves, it is doubtful that we love God. “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ yet hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen” (I John 4:20, NIV).
Love is precisely the issue we face today. Capitalism, democracy, consumerism, entrepreneurism, enterprise, education, and just about any human institution conceivable fly unashamedly in the face of Christianity—and so do all other human endeavors including socialism, communism, monarchy, and so on. Although these all are not on equal footing, a conversation that must be reserved for another time, they all are superintended by sinners, all of whom frequently botch the answer to the question: what are people for?
Cain and Able saw one another in purely utilitarian terms. The other was a way for each to achieve something for himself. The other’s future was considered expendable, something to be used like so much pocket change. The outcome of that relationship was predictable: embezzlement and murder.
The decision to love is a commitment to give rather than to get. Getters push their way through life, grasping at opportunity and nipping at the heels of others. Getters are more concerned about their goals than the people they encounter along the way. Getters are devoted to their visions of success and progress rather than to the well-being of the individuals with whom they share office space. Although they often have some altruistic explanation for how their grand schemes will benefit people, the people nearest them never seem to realize these benefits on a daily basis, and the ultimate payback tends to flow right back to the chief getter himself.
Love is about giving, not getting, and if that be so, then what are people for?
Jesus said loving others is the second-greatest commandment. I wonder if the greatest commandment is more difficult than the second-greatest.
This article was simultaneously published in the May-June 2009 Vision.
© Rodney Shaw and rodneyshaw.wordpress.com 2009. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Rodney Shaw and rodneyshaw.wordpress.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.